Share this
4 alternatives to wet blood collection
by Neoteryx Microsampling on Mar 8, 2017 6:40:00 AM
Blood sampling for blood analysis is still one of the most important aspects of medicine. A scientist or physician can learn so much from a drop or two of blood!
The methods for collecting blood samples are changing, however. Traditionally, when a scientist or doctor wanted to explore the underlying cause of a person's symptoms, they sent them to the lab for "blood work." This involved a venipuncture blood draw performed by a trained technician, who would insert a needle into a person's vein to draw wet blood into glass tubes. The tubes of wet blood would be tested in the lab.
Today there are several alternative methods to the traditional wet blood collection method, and they provide several advantages.
Here we list four new blood collection methods that may soon make the traditional blood draw and wet blood collection obsolete.
1. Dried Blood Spot (DBS)
Obtained by pricking a finger-tip or heel with a lancet and placing a few drops of blood onto a dried blood spot (DBS) card, DBS sampling provides a simple, user-friendly method of sampling that does not require a controlled environment or a trained phlebotomist.
DBS can be used in most self-sampling scenarios, including outside the clinic. With the traditional DBS card method, a method that has been in use for about 50 years, the blood samples are collected and stored on cards made of a special filter paper.
However, DBS is not suitable for analyzing volatile and air-sensitive analytes. Another drawback of traditional DBS from an analytical point of view is an uneven distribution of the analytes within the spot, caused by analyte nature, DBS card substrate, spotting conditions and, mainly, blood hematocrit.
With traditional DBS cards, there is also a risk of carryover contamination, associated with the sample preparation (punching a pre-sized, partial sample from the DBS disc).
A newer microsampling device called the hemaPEN®, offers a new more precise way to collect DBS samples onto 4 pre-punched DBS filter papers inside the device.
Once the hemaPEN arrives in the lab for sample processing, the technicians can skip the punching step. Otherwise, the DBS workflow in the lab is much the same.
2. Pre-Cut Dried Blood Spot (PCDBS)
Pre-cut dried blood spot (PCDBS) is a variation of DBS, where the entire spot is analyzed, to reduce or eliminate the impact that hematocrit has on spot formation and subsequent sample quality. The method retains almost all advantages of other microsampling techniques while overcoming the biggest challenge of traditional DBS, hematocrit impact.
However, as with traditional DBS, it requires a precise and accurate volume of blood, making it less suitable for self-sampling scenarios by non-trained individuals.
In these scenarios, the hemaPEN device may be more suitable.
3. Dried Plasma Spot (DPS)
Using dried plasma spots (DPS) instead of DBS represents another approach for avoiding the impact of hematocrit, while still retaining all the advantages over wet blood collection, including ease of collecting, processing, transporting, and storage of samples.
In a self-sampling setting, the patient applies a finger-prick blood drop to a multi-layer collection card and peels off the top layer (separation membrane) after a few minutes. Plasma spot is formed on a lower layer (collection membrane). This technique, however, cannot be used when whole blood samples are required for analysis.
4. Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling
Volumetric absorptive microsampling represents a novel approach that allows for fixed-volume collection of blood with Mitra® microsampling technology, independent of the hematocrit levels, ambient conditions such as temperature and humidity, finger-prick blood drop size, and the time spent collecting the sample.
As such, the Mitra® device based on VAMS® technology provides all of the benefits of DBS, without any of the drawbacks. VAMS can be performed in all self-sampling scenarios, while still being usable for semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis.
VAMS also has advantages in preclinical animal studies for drug development and toxicology, where low sample volumes mean fewer test animals are used. The VAMS microsampling approach provides preclinical researchers with a significant ethical advantage.
In human medicine, microsampling techniques remove the need for venipuncture blood draws, greatly reducing a person's stress and discomfort. Microsampling techniques require only a quick finger-stick or arm-prick. They also reduce sample handling and contamination risks, while increasing sample stability and reducing storage and transportation costs.
Image Credits: Trajan, Neoteryx, Shutterstock, iStock
Share this
- Microsampling (206)
- Research, Remote Research (119)
- Venipuncture Alternative (106)
- Clinical Trials, Clinical Research (83)
- Mitra® Device (73)
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, TDM (50)
- Dried Blood Spot, DBS (38)
- Biomonitoring, Health, Wellness (31)
- Infectious Disease, Vaccines, COVID-19 (24)
- Decentralized Clinical Trial (DCT) (22)
- Blood Microsampling, Serology (21)
- Omics, Multi-Omics (19)
- Specimen Collection (17)
- Toxicology, Doping, Drug/Alcohol Monitoring, PEth (17)
- hemaPEN® Device (13)
- Preclinical Research, Animal Studies (12)
- Harpera® Tool (9)
- Pharmaceuticals, Drug Development (9)
- Skin Microsampling, Microbiopsy (8)
- Industry News, Microsampling News (5)
- Antibodies, MAbs (3)
- Company Press Release, Product Press Release (3)
- Environmental Toxins, Exposures (1)
- October 2024 (1)
- September 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (4)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (3)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (3)
- June 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (2)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (3)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (5)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (4)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (3)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (3)
- March 2020 (6)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (3)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (6)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (6)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (8)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (6)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (6)
- April 2017 (6)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (1)
- July 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think