Share this
why use dried blood tests vs. wet blood tests?
by Neoteryx Microsampling on Oct 5, 2020 9:00:00 AM
Blood sampling is an invaluable part of clinical research, but blood collection methods and blood storage chains are resource-intensive and sometimes wasteful. Most traditional blood collection methods require clinic visits for venous blood draws, with a healthcare professional collecting vials of wet blood that are sent to the lab for analysis.
The entire blood draw and blood sample transport process is not only tedious, but labor-intensive. Remember, wet blood requires special storage and transportation procedures to keep the samples stable until they are analyzed in a lab. This can be challenging and costly, especially when a person must undergo frequent blood collection and testing for long term therapeutic drug monitoring.
In an effort to simplify blood collection and testing, scientists have developed dried blood sampling methods that simplify the process and reduce the resources required for blood collection, shipping and analysis.
What is dried blood sampling and testing?
Dried blood spot (DBS) or dried blood sampling is an innovative blood collection technique where small blood samples are collected from a lanced fingertip or heel and the blood drops are blotted onto an absorbent paper and allowed to dry for analysis.
The DBS concept was introduced in 1963 by Dr. Robert Guthrie. Dr. Guthrie discovered that a few drops of capillary blood obtained from pricking the finger or heel and blotted onto DBS filter paper could be used to screen for metabolic diseases in newborns. The dried blood samples were stable at room temperature and didn't require cold shipping or handling while in transit to the laboratory for bioanalysis.
What is the efficacy of dried blood testing?
Research conducted at Uppsala University, Sweden, showed that dried blood testing in a lab doesn’t require chemical modifiers to stabilize specific analytes. The researchers evaluated recently collected dried blood spots and those preserved for 30 years in biobanks to determine 92 protein levels. Wet samples stored at -70°C were also evaluated.
The researchers found that the drying process had a negligible effect on the protein level in the blood samples and that dried samples had numerous advantages over wet samples.
4 Benefits of Using DBS vs. Wet Blood Sampling
Based on research studies, here is an overview of dried blood sampling and testing benefits:
1. Greater Comfort for Patients and Study Subjects
Dried blood sampling with remote collection devices can be used as a flexible and convenient way to provide patient-centric care in different settings. With dried blood sampling, only a small volume of blood needs to be collected, typically using a finger-prick method to collect a drop or two of capillary blood from the fingertip.
The DBS approach doesn't require a needle poked into a vein of the arm, so it is less painful or scary for kids and needle-phobic adults. Because the finger-prick method of blood collection is minimally invasive, the patient is less anxious, and the collection procedure is executed faster and more easily.
Blood collection using finger-stick sampling approach can be self-administered at home without professional help. Typically, the patient or study subject receives a sample collection kit that contains the sampling device and supplies. They use the enclosed lancet to prick their fingertip and self-collect the blood samples. After sample collection, they mail their samples to the lab where the samples will be processes and analyzed.
2. High-Quality Blood Samples
There is now a newer method of dried blood sampling that is an advance on the DBS method that was standardized by Dr. Guthrie. The newer method is called volumetric microsampling. One method is called volumetric absorptive microsampling, which is based on small sampling devices that are designed with VAMS® technology.
VAMS technology makes it easy to collect a fixed-volume blood sample. The VAMS approach facilitates the collection of a very precise volume and high-quality blood sample, thanks to a small absorptive VAMS tip at the end of each microsampler in the device. Mitra® devices with VAMS technology can be used by lay people to collect small blood samples, typically from a finger-prick, with relative ease.
These smaller blood samples will dry on the VAMS tip of the Mitra devices. Once the sampled devices arrive in the lab, the VAMS tips are processed following a DBS workflow. The samples are analyzed as dried blood microsamples, typically providing results that correlate to those of wet blood samples.
The ease and convenience of this approach is quite a change from traditional venipuncture blood draws, which involve a phlebotomist puncturing a vein in the patient's arm to draw several tubes of blood in one session, with each tube containing a blood volume of 5-10 mL.
With the VAMS approach, a much smaller volume of blood is collected — typically no more than 120 µL with each finger-stick sampling session.
Another device that utilizes volumetric microsampling is the hemaPEN, which simultaneously collects four volumetrically identical capillary samples from a single finger-stick.
The hemaPEN contains four glass capillary tubes that draw the blood drops from one finger-stick into the device, and transfers four dried blood spot (DBS) samples onto four pre-punched DBA filter papers housed inside the device.
Each of the four blood spots is a precise 2.74 μL ± 5 % in volume.
Click the hemaPEN shut after sample collection, and the four DBS samples are locked inside it until lab processing.
An advantage of using dried blood testing is that it doesn't require large volumes of blood for accurate analysis. In most cases, there isn't a need to take large blood samples from patients for testing. This means that less blood is wasted, since a large portion of the wet blood collected in phlebotomy tubes goes unused in the lab. Further, repeated and large volume sampling is undesirable, especially for smaller patients or those who must submit to frequent blood draws for drug monitoring or other medical interventions.
With dried blood samples that were collected using newer volumetric microsampling technologies, the quality of samples has been shown to be relatively high. For example, studies show that blood microsamples collected remotely by study participants using Mitra with VAMS at home can be analyzed for detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in those previously exposed to the virus. In another example, studies show that blood microsamples collected using the hemaPEN can be analyzed to accurately detect people's exposure to environmental toxins, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) chemical substances.
3. Easier Shipping
Wet blood must be transported refrigerated or frozen and must remain in cold storage to prevent bacterial growth. Strict regulations govern the transportation of liquid blood products from the collection point to the lab. Dried blood sample collection doesn't require cold shipping or cold storage.
Since the blood in or on a volumetric microsampling device will dry after collection and remain stable at ambient temperatures, there is no need for cold shipping or cold storage.
4. Facilitates Remote Testing
With traditional approaches to blood collection, phlebotomists or other health workers perform venous blood draws to collect wet blood samples, which requires in-person visits. With mobile phlebotomy, the phlebotomist needs to visit a patient at home to collect the blood. The procedure exposes both the patient and the phlebotomist to potential infection. Additionally, the tubes of wet blood must be transported from the patient's home to the lab using cold shipping.
Dried blood eliminates these challenges and restrictions, since blood collection can be performed at home by the patient or study subject themselves. The sample can then be easily sent through the mail directly to the lab for testing. Dried blood microsamples dry in transit and arrive at the lab as dried blood samples, ready for processing and analysis. After testing, the treating physician or clinical researcher can access the lab results and follow-up with the patient or research subject remotely via telecommunications.
Learn more about dried blood microsampling:
Share this
- Microsampling (206)
- Research, Remote Research (118)
- Venipuncture Alternative (106)
- Clinical Trials, Clinical Research (83)
- Mitra® Device (73)
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, TDM (50)
- Dried Blood Spot, DBS (38)
- Biomonitoring, Health, Wellness (31)
- Infectious Disease, Vaccines, COVID-19 (24)
- Decentralized Clinical Trial (DCT) (22)
- Blood Microsampling, Serology (21)
- Omics, Multi-Omics (19)
- Specimen Collection (17)
- Toxicology, Doping, Drug/Alcohol Monitoring, PEth (17)
- hemaPEN® Device (13)
- Preclinical Research, Animal Studies (12)
- Pharmaceuticals, Drug Development (9)
- Harpera® Tool (7)
- Skin Microsampling, Microbiopsy (6)
- Industry News, Microsampling News (5)
- Antibodies, MAbs (3)
- Company Press Release, Product Press Release (3)
- Environmental Toxins, Exposures (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (4)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (3)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (3)
- June 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (2)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (3)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (5)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (4)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (3)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (3)
- March 2020 (6)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (3)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (6)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (6)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (8)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (6)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (6)
- April 2017 (6)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (1)
- July 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think