Share this
using VAMS for adherence to antihypertensive drugs
by James Rudge, PhD, Technical Director, Neoteryx on Jan 9, 2023 9:15:00 AM
An article by Cathy M. Jacobs et al at Saarland University in Germany and Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the United States published in the October 2022 edition of Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, discussed an assay developed for measuring adherence testing of antihypertensive drugs.
The paper is entitled “Closing the gap — development of an analytical methodology using volumetric absorptive microsampling of finger prick blood followed by LC-HRMS/MS for adherence monitoring of antihypertensive drugs.” The study showed that capillary dried blood and plasma cannot be used interchangeably, and new capillary blood reference ranges must be created.
The researchers highlighted the benefits of using Mitra® devices based on VAMS® technology for finger-prick blood sampling, stating that the VAMS-based strategy was “suitable for assessing adherence of all classes of antihypertensive drugs used in the guidelines to manage hypertension.”
Defining Drug Adherence and Understanding the Dangers of Non-Adherence
In a book entitled “Analytical Chemistry for Assessing Medical Adherence,” authors Sangeeta Tanna and Graham Lawson give an excellent overview in the first chapter about the effects of medical adherence on both individuals and society at large.
They define adherence as “the extent to which a patient’s behavior matches the agreed recommendations of the prescriber.” The chapter also summarizes a number of worrying statistics pertaining to the effects of non-adherence.
For example, in 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that worldwide adherence rates averaged at around 50%. Studies show that 34% of patients in the United States stopped taking their medication within a month of being discharged from hospital after being treated for a myocardial infection.
A study of diabetes patients revealed that the adherence rate of those taking oral medications for type II diabetes mellitus ranged widely from 36-93%.
Sadly, the results of non-adherence to medication have been linked to 125,000 annual deaths in the US alone and nearly 200,000 premature deaths in the European Union.
However, non-adherence to prescribed medications impacts more than health and mortality. Tanna and Lawson also reviewed the financial impact of non-adherence on healthcare systems.
For example, 33-69% of medicine-related hospital admissions were linked to non-adherence, leading to an annual cost of $100 -300 billion! Furthermore, it was reported in 2012 that US based pharmaceutical companies lost around $180 billion due to patients not refilling their medications upon request.
Furthermore, the aforementioned 2003 report from the WHO stated that people would benefit more from efforts to reduce non-adherence than they would from efforts focused on developing new treatments.
The Burden of Hypertension
The paper by Cathy M. Jacobs et al focused in on the burden of hypertension and reported that over 1 million deaths were caused by the disease in 2019 alone. Sadly, non-adherence to antihypertensive drugs (AHD) is at around 50%. For those who have resistant hypertension, adherence assessment is recommended.
Many of these assessment methods are more qualitative than quantitative, including self-reporting of adherence behavior, which can be inaccurate. A more accurate tool to monitor adherence is to measure drug levels in either the urine or blood.
Indeed, the paper authors commented on a previous study in which both blood pressure and adherence in nonadherent patients improved when conducting therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) via analyzing samples of urine or blood.
They went on to highlight that LC-MS/MS methods for these drugs had been primarily developed for wet blood, serum or plasma. For home sampling, they commented that although dried blood spot (DBS) sampling was an alternative to venipuncture for many assays, DBS had some issues.
On the other hand, volumetric absorptive microsampling overcame a number of the issues encountered with DBS, including hematocrit bias. Moreover, VAMS technology had been deployed in related studies with successful results.
Therefore, the group embarked on a study aimed at closing an analytical gap by improving a strategy based on VAMS to measure common drugs for treating hypertension.
Study Methods and Findings
- The following drugs were used for the study: canrenone, enalaprilat, furosemide, hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, ramiprilat and torasemide.
- The VAMS extraction and LC-MS/MS method was validated according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) guideline on Bioanalytical Method Validation and the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT) guideline for Development and Validation of Dried Blood Spot-Based Methods for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
- Capillary dried blood and venous plasma samples were compared.
- Highlights of the validation were as follows:
- An aqueous extraction followed by protein precipitation was conducted from the 10 µL tips of Mitra devices based on VAMS technology.
- Nominal values of percent extraction recovery were comparable for most analytes when comparing high and Low QC levels and across three percent hematocrit (HCT) levels (20, 40 and 60%). However, most of the analytes showed varied matrix effects between same QC and HCT levels.
- No on-tip degradation of analytes (within 15%) was observed for all analytes stored at 24 °C in the dark.
- The present method thus allowed for the quantification of torasemide and enalaprilat.
- An aqueous extraction followed by protein precipitation was conducted from the 10 µL tips of Mitra devices based on VAMS technology.
- A proof-of-concept study was conducted on 18 matched capillary VAMS vs venous plasma patient samples measuring 7 different antihypertensive medications.
- Due to blood to plasma differences in partitioning ratios, it was difficult to correlate the plasma values to whole blood, so the authors reported that new reference ranges would need to be set. The authors also noted that based on the current results “[Mitra devices with] VAMS are suitable tools for adherence monitoring of ACE-inhibitors and diuretics and may replace venipuncture in the future.”
- From the study, 6 patients were classified as non- or partially adherent, however a limitation of the study was that these were inpatients, so adherence levels were probably artificially high.
Study Authors’ Conclusions
- Adherence monitoring is of great interest and has great advantages.
- A proof-of-concept study on 18 patients using Mitra devices with VAMS was conducted.
- Analytes were stable on Mitra devices with VAMS, but new reference ranges would need to be set for capillary blood.
- The method allowed for measurements to assess the adherence of all guideline-listed antihypertensive drugs from one VAMS tip on a Mitra device.
- Differences in dried capillary blood to wet plasma would need to be further investigated and specific reference ranges for a wider range of similar drugs would need to be assessed.
Neoteryx Conclusions
This study highlights the importance of optimizing the extraction methodology and also understanding the importance of blood to plasma partitioning.
In an example of successful extraction methodology, scientists at Merck pharmaceuticals demonstrated a significant improvement in matrix effect when they shifted from a suboptimal method to a liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) of an aqueous VAMS extract.
This resulted in high extraction recovery and, at the same time, a very low matrix effect. Furthermore, blood to plasma partitioning for TDM applications in the field of anticonvulsants has been reviewed in a recent article and we encourage the reader to read this important publication.
Although further research needs to be conducted before VAMS sampling can be effectively deployed for adherence monitoring, the study by Cathy M. Jacobs et al demonstrates the future utility of using VAMS for this purpose.
This article was summarized for our readers by James Rudge, PhD, Neoteryx Technical Director. This is curated content. To learn more about the important research outlined in this blog, visit the original article in Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.
Image Credits: iStock, Neoteryx, Trajan
For more information on how Neoteryx microsampling products from Trajan help researchers, visit our Technical Resource Library.
Share this
- Microsampling (206)
- Research, Remote Research (119)
- Venipuncture Alternative (106)
- Clinical Trials, Clinical Research (83)
- Mitra® Device (74)
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, TDM (51)
- Dried Blood Spot, DBS (38)
- Biomonitoring, Health, Wellness (31)
- Infectious Disease, Vaccines, COVID-19 (24)
- Blood Microsampling, Serology (22)
- Decentralized Clinical Trial (DCT) (22)
- Omics, Multi-Omics (20)
- Specimen Collection (17)
- Toxicology, Doping, Drug/Alcohol Monitoring, PEth (17)
- hemaPEN® Device (13)
- Preclinical Research, Animal Studies (12)
- Skin Microsampling, Microbiopsy (12)
- Pharmaceuticals, Drug Development (9)
- Harpera Device (5)
- Industry News, Microsampling News (5)
- Antibodies, MAbs (3)
- Company Press Release, Product Press Release (3)
- Environmental Toxins, Exposures (1)
- December 2024 (2)
- November 2024 (1)
- October 2024 (3)
- September 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (4)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (3)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (3)
- June 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (2)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (3)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (5)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (4)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (3)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (3)
- March 2020 (6)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (3)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (6)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (6)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (8)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (6)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (6)
- April 2017 (6)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (1)
- July 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think