Share this
how remote microsampling supports virtual clinical trials and cuts costs
by Neoteryx Microsampling on May 24, 2021 9:00:00 AM
According to a 2014 study, the cost of developing a new drug is $2.6 billion. This high expense doesn’t include the additional cost of post-approval development to determine dosage strengths and formulations.
An expense breakdown of clinical trials for new drugs showed that the factors influencing the costs most were onsite clinic visits and the number of study participants required to establish treatment effects. The analysis estimated that the per-participant expense for an onsite trial averaged $41,413, with each individual trial site visit incurring a cost of $3,685 per person.
These findings highlight the need to adopt cheaper ways of performing clinical trials. One way would be to take a remote approach to clinical trials, and eliminate the need for onsite visits to a central facility. A decentralized clinical trial (DCT) model utilizing digital communications paired with remote specimen collection for remote monitoring has become a popular solution. This model reduces the overall cost of performing clinical trials. It’s also more convenient for clinical trial participants, which promotes retention rates.
What Are Decentralized Clinical Trials?
Traditional clinical trials have physical sites where study participants using the drugs, medical devices, and other new therapies are monitored and tested onsite. A decentralized clinical trial is conducted remotely with study participants remaining at home. Trial staff utilize telehealth communications, web-based platforms, digital devices, apps, wearables, remote specimen collection and other remote tools. A decentralized trial reduces reliance on physical clinical visits and intermediaries.
A decentralized model relies on remote monitoring of participants. This means that study participant data is collected using digital and other technologies that enable people to eliminate or reduce their onsite visits. This shift has led to the development of remote tools, such as microsampling devices, that allow untrained study participants to collect their own specimen samples that can be mailed to a lab for scientific analysis and validation.
The decentralized model also redefines how data is collected. In the past, a professional from the study team would collect and record data in person, using a hardcopy case report form. The data would then be manually uploaded to a computer system to provide evidence in support of the study endpoint. The information would be used to monitor participants and inform them about future protocols.
With decentralized clinical trials, digital platforms and applications (apps) are used to collect more endpoint-supporting data. As such, most of the data collected is participant-generated, either via a web portal where they can input their information from a home computer, or via a wearable device that automatically sends digital data to a central computer. Participant-generated data input reduces the need for trial staff to perform data collection and data entry tasks. This cuts down on staffing costs and often delivers data more reliably and efficiently. These digital and automated data collection methods are key components of a “virtual" or decentralized clinical trial.
Why Decentralized Clinical Trials Are Attractive
Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) present five major benefits to clinical research organizations and study participants, including:
1. Reduced Clinical Procedures
According to an infographic from Clinical Research.io (CRIO), staffing & administrative activities (20%), and clinical procedures make up the highest percentage (20%) of the overall cost of a drug trial. This is primarily because of the number of site visits participants make during a trial. Clinical trials reviewed by ISMP showed that each study participant makes approximately 11 site visits or more, adding up to $2 million to the overall trial cost.
DCTs use digital technology to reach and engage patients directly. Digital tools and remote specimen collection devices, such as the easy-to-use Mitra® device, work in tandem with a trial website where participants can get information and submit feedback, reports, and more.
DCTs also reduce site-related costs. Since the model isn’t site-dependent, most trials only need one central location from which to coordinate patient involvement. This location might be a researcher's lab or office, rather than a larger trial site that must be specially allocated, leased and monitored following specific regulatory guidance as required for participant visits and trial activities. The reduction in the number of trial sites needed is another driver of cost savings with virtual clinical trials.
2. Easier Sample Collection
Most clinical trials, particularly drug trials, require blood tests to help researchers examine drug concentration levels, side effects and potential toxicity, as well as benefits and efficacy related to drug dosage.
Previously, blood tests have been performed using vials of wet blood samples. Wet samples were collected onsite by trained staff using traditional phlebotomy methods, such as venipuncture. Trial costs using these methods were significantly higher because wet blood needs special handling, cold-chain shipping and storage to maintain its integrity and stability for clinical testing.
With virtual clinical trials, remote sampling kits like Mitra® Collection Kits are shipped out to study participants. The kits contain portable Mitra devices for easy and convenient sample collection by study participants at home. The samples collected with these devices, based on volumetric absorptive microsampling, are analyzed in the lab as dried blood specimens. For this reason, no cold-chain shipping or storage is required.
A finger-prick method is used by participants to self-collect blood samples. The participant can mail their samples back to the research lab for analysis using the regular postal system. No medical professionals are needed for sample collection and no special shipping or storage mechanisms are required. This lowers costs substantially.
This participate-from-home approach presents three other advantages for study participants:
- Most trial activities are completed at home, including virtual communications with trial staff
- No need to visit the trial site for multiple blood draws
- No travel involved for routine tests
3. Leverages Real-Time Data
The success of virtual clinical trials depends on the ability to leverage digital resources. Researchers need real-time data to monitor changes in study participants. With digital applications and wearables, clinical researchers can obtain this data directly from the patients.
4. Covers Wider Geographical Areas
Decentralized clinical trials allow researchers to recruit participants from more regions because there’s no need for travel. There’s better access to participants across wider geographies, and across broader demographics such as sex, race, age, and others. This approach helps diversify the pool of volunteers, which is essential when collecting data for trials.
5. Improves Volunteer Retention
Traditional clinical trials experience a high drop-out rate because of the amount of time, disruption and resources required. Some participants find they are missing too much work, school, and other activities to continue attending trial visits. This isn’t the case with DCTs.
Remote monitoring and communication technologies enable researchers to collect samples remotely and check-in with the participants virtually as often as necessary without waiting for a face-to-face visit, as in traditional clinical trials.
The researchers can collect biometric information, like heart rate or activity 24/7. With most activities being completed from home, trial participants are more likely to comply with the requirements and stay committed through the completion of the trial. With the right tools in place, a decentralized clinical trial is a win-win for everyone.
Share this
- Microsampling (206)
- Research, Remote Research (118)
- Venipuncture Alternative (106)
- Clinical Trials, Clinical Research (83)
- Mitra® Device (73)
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, TDM (50)
- Dried Blood Spot, DBS (38)
- Biomonitoring, Health, Wellness (31)
- Infectious Disease, Vaccines, COVID-19 (24)
- Decentralized Clinical Trial (DCT) (22)
- Blood Microsampling, Serology (21)
- Omics, Multi-Omics (19)
- Specimen Collection (17)
- Toxicology, Doping, Drug/Alcohol Monitoring, PEth (17)
- hemaPEN® Device (13)
- Preclinical Research, Animal Studies (12)
- Pharmaceuticals, Drug Development (9)
- Harpera® Tool (7)
- Skin Microsampling, Microbiopsy (6)
- Industry News, Microsampling News (5)
- Antibodies, MAbs (3)
- Company Press Release, Product Press Release (3)
- Environmental Toxins, Exposures (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (4)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (3)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (3)
- June 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (2)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (3)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (5)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (4)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (3)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (3)
- March 2020 (6)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (3)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (6)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (6)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (8)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (6)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (6)
- April 2017 (6)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (1)
- July 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think