the microsampling blog In some territories, which are listed in our website footer, our microsampling devices are supplied for therapeutic or IVD use as referenced in some of our content. Outside of those territories our devices are supplied for research use only (RUO).

using VAMS to measure drug level and renal function

by James Rudge, PhD, Technical Director, Neoteryx | 6 min read

An article by David J Marshall and Brian G Keevil et al at Wythenshawe Hospital and Nottingham Hospital, UK that was published in the July 2020 issue of Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, reported on a simultaneous extraction method for analysis of tacrolimus and creatinine from one 10 µL VAMS tip on a Mitra device. Mitra microsampling devices are portable and can be used by study participants at home to self-collect blood samples and mail them to the research lab for analysis. The paper summarized here is entitled “Assessment of tacrolimus and creatinine concentration collected using Mitra microsampling devices.” It describes a method where capillary dried blood samples collected on Mitra® devices based on VAMS® technology were compared to 135 venous serum (creatinine) samples, and venous wet blood (tacrolimus) samples that had been collected from transplant patients. Both analytes showed minimum assay bias comparing capillary samples on Mitra to the traditional samples. The team commented that the method they had developed “could open up the opportunity for patients to perform tacrolimus and kidney function monitoring at home.”

Objective of the Renal Function & Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) Study

Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for creatinine and tacrolimus on Mitra devices with VAMS for monitoring renal transplant patients.
Renal Transplant Monitoring_iStock-1125719605-1-1-1

Monitoring Renal Transplantation Patients

In 2017 it was reported that in the US alone there were 220,000 surviving transplant renal patients and that these patients require regular medication to prevent organ rejection. As discussed in a previous blog, one of the most popular medications available to prevent graft loss is the calcineurin inhibitor, tacrolimus. Like all calcineurin inhibitors, tacrolimus requires therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This monitoring is necessary to measure drug concentration level in patients to ensure optimal efficacy, due to the narrow therapeutic window of tacrolimus. However, measuring drug level alone does not monitor the healthy function of the graft, it simply tracks a patient’s medical adherence and ensures that the drug is titrated to an appropriate level for each individual. To monitor the health of the transplanted kidney, it is also critical to routinely monitor renal function. This can be achieved with a simple blood test.

A popular renal function biomarker is creatinine (often excreted by muscle tissue), a breakdown product of the amino acid, creatine. As kidney function declines, serum creatinine concentration increases. Indeed, according to the Beaumont Hospital Kidney Centre in Dublin, Ireland, a “very well- functioning renal transplant should have a serum creatinine of around 100 to 120 µmol/L.”

The causes of elevated creatinine levels can include issues with the flow of urine from the kidney to the bladder, too high a level of tacrolimus (or of other similar medications), graft rejection, stenosis of the transplant artery, polyoma virus infection, or a reoccurrence of the original cause of renal failure.

According to the paper by Marshall and Keevil et al, historically renal transplant patients have had to regularly attend clinics to monitor their kidney function and drug levels. These onsite clinic visits require burdensome travel and time away from work or school. Furthermore, the authors commented that onsite monitoring “can be very expensive for the NHS.” As with a 2019 paper published by investigators of a notable Oslo Hospital study, the aim of this paper was to develop a method using VAMS samples so that patients could be monitored remotely. In this study by Marshall and Keevil et al, tacrolimus trough levels were monitored along with creatinine levels using a shared extraction method from one 10 µL VAMS tip on a Mitra device.

Renal Function & TDM Study Methods

  • For tacrolimus, the team purchased commercially available calibrators. However, they made their own QCs from pooled whole blood, which they absorbed onto the VAMS tips of Mitra devices and stored at -20° C until testing.

  • For creatinine, Calibrators and QCs were made in PBS as creatinine is inherently present in blood samples. To confirm suitability, these were compared to whole blood samples of a known amount of creatinine and were then spiked onto the VAMS tips of Mitra devices and stored.

  • Extraction from Mitra devices involved vortexing first in water then the resulting blood water was precipitated with zinc sulfate and methanol. Finally, IS was added for both drug and biomarker. The sample was centrifuged, and the resulting sample was injected onto the LC-MS/MS.

  • For the clinical study, anonymized renal transplant samples (n=135) – both venous samples (WB and serum) and also dried Mitra (capillary fingerpick samples) – were obtained from Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and mailed to Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK and stored at –20° C until testing.

  • For comparison purposes, 43 serum samples were tested on a Roche enzymatic creatinine assay.

  • External UK quality assurance samples (NEQAS EQA) also were used to measure both drug and biomarker.

  • National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) creatinine standard reference material also was measured for comparison purposes.

  • The assay was fully validated including measuring assay imprecision, matrix effects, recovery, linearity, and extraction stability.

  • VAMS-Mitra stability was conducted by storing samples under desiccant for up to 25 days at -20° C, 4° C, 22° C, 37° C ad 60° C.

  • HCT range of 0.23 – 0.45 L/L was also assessed.

Renal Function & TDM Study Results

  • Inter and intra assay imprecision data was well within accepted limits for both analytes.

  • The mean recovery of tacrolimus from Mitra was 99% (97-102%). For creatinine, it was 108% (100-115).

  • For creatinine, negligible bias was seen for EQA samples and the NIST certified reference material.

  • The internal standard compensated well for any matrix effects for tacrolimus. For creatinine, ion suppression was negligible.

  • Mean tacrolimus bias for Mitra comparing routine results was -5.6% (95% CI –8.5 to –2.7%) and -6.5% for creatinine (95% CI –8.5 to –4.5%).

  • Passing-Bablok analysis resulted in Mitra tacrolimus = 0.93 x routine tacrolimus + 0.07 µg/L. For Creatinine = 0.91 x serum creatinine +1.81 µmol/L.

  • Stability bias of the Mitra samples were < 10% for all temperatures for 14 days except for 37° C (7 days) and 60° C (1 day).

  • The authors reported that for Mitra, results at each HCT concentration were within 10% of the pipetted results for tacrolimus and creatinine.

Study Authors’ Discussion and Conclusions

  • Successful development of a shared extraction method from Mitra devices with VAMS technology for tacrolimus and creatinine where only the column and MP B needed changing for each analyte.

  • The research group preferred VAMS over DBS because in their experience “DBS are prone to the HCT effect caused by variations in spreading and sample homogeneity and require a larger yield of blood (approximately 75 lL).” They also concluded that Mitra samples (10 µL) would be easier to collect for pediatric patients.

  • Stability of Mitra demonstrated that “postal and subsequent storage prior to analysis is acceptable.” Also, no significant HCT bias was seen.

  • No systemic bias was seen between capillary fingerpick and venous samples.

  • The researchers used QC martials where they gravimetrically matched the specific lot volume of Mitra to minimize any potential inter-lot bias.

  • The group reported that while there was no systemic bias in the assay “the variation needs to be considered based on the indication in clinical practice.”

  • The research team reported that precision of the microsampling method was good, and they were making efforts to minimize variation in the fingerpick sampling.

  • The authors concluded that this assay would have a positive effect on patients in terms of care and time. They also proposed that remote sampling would reduce the risk of catching transmissible infections like Covid-19.

Final Comments

The research discussed in this paper shows great potential for how remote sampling can be used to significantly improve the care of patients needing routine clinical tests. This ground-breaking research study is unique, as it is the first assay to measure both drug and biomarker in dried blood from one 10 µL device for such an assay. If used in routine testing, this would not only be highly convenient to the patient, it would also be highly convenient for the research scientist: from just one extraction, two very different tests could be performed in the laboratory, thus demonstrating a highly efficient workflow.

This study paper was summarized for our readers by James Rudge, PhD, Neoteryx Technical Director. This is curated content. To learn more about the important research outlined in this review, visit the original article published in the journal, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry.

Image Credit: Kidneys, Renal Function, iStock Images.

You can access this paper and other microsampling studies in our Technical Resource Library

tech-library-1-1

Originally published Mar 21, 2022 9:00:00 AM, updated on March 21, 2022

Comments

Learn about insights, research, case studies, and tutorials on integrating remote specimen collection, microsampling, and more!

search our blog

social media

subscribe to the blog