Share this
exploring alternatives to scalpel and traditional punch skin biopsies
by Florian Lapierre, PhD, Microsampling Product Director on Oct 30, 2024 1:22:52 PM
In recent times, advancements in analytical instrumentations such as Hyphenated Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS, GC-MS, etc.), PCR technologies, and others have provided the opportunity for microsampling collection techniques to arise. The demand for less invasive methods of collecting biological samples has finally arrived for dermatology with the novel development of the Harpera™ Microbiopsy™ Punch.
Traditional skin biopsies, which often entail invasive and painful surgical procedures, are being reconsidered as many discover and explore the newer Microbiopsy, which is a smaller, less invasive punch alternative. Unlike conventional methods with their stitches and scarring, Harpera's spring-loaded microsampling technology offers a quick, precise and virtually painless skin sampling event, providing a significant relief from the discomfort patients usually experience.
The Harpera Microbiopsy Punch presents a more straightforward skin sampling procedure that may reduce the risk of infection or complications and accelerate recovery time—while offering a gentler alternative to traditional skin sampling procedures. This signals to the community the arrival of a technological advancement that can improve the patient experience and research outcomes in ways that have not been possible before.
The table below summarizes the key advantages of skin Microbiopsy punch over the traditional biopsy punch method to collect a skin specimen.
|
Traditional Biopsy Punch
|
Harpera™ Microbiopsy™ Punch
|
|
Requires cutting a ⌀3-6mm piece of skin tissue |
Collects a micro specimen, with a small puncture (0.1 x 0.5mm) |
|
Takes about 15-30 minutes |
Takes few seconds |
|
Typically requires local anesthesia |
Does not require anesthesia |
|
Requires stitches and/or wound dressing |
No stitches, minimal wound. No scar |
|
Recovery time can be several days to weeks, depending on the biopsy site |
Faster healing, typically within a few days |
|
Physician and nurses required to perform procedure. 30 USD of materials. 80 USD for whole procedure1 |
Any healthcare provider (i.e. nurse) can perform procedure. 20 USD in materials. Est. 30 USD for whole procedure |
|
Not suited for multiple biopsies in narrow time window |
Suited for frequent sampling at one site and/or over time |
Third-party Publications:
- Yamada, M., et al. (2020). "Microbiopsy-based minimally invasive skin sampling for molecular analysis is acceptable to Epidermolysis Bullosa Simplex patients where conventional diagnostic biopsy was refused." Skin Res Technol.
- Preis, S., et al. (2022). "Munich atopy prediction study (MAPS): protocol for a prospective birth cohort addressing clinical and molecular risk factors for a topic dermatitis in early childhood." BMJ Open12 (9): e059256.
- Kirstein, O.D., et al. (2017). "Minimally invasive microbiopsies: a novel sampling method for identifying asymptomatic, potentially infectious carriers of Leishmania donovani." Int J Parasitol 47(10-11): 609-616.
See the complete publications list here.
shifting toward minimally invasive skin biopsies
Harpera's non-invasive technology can be the ideal sampling device to be used in conjunction with a wide range of dermatological applications, from diagnosing skin cancers to monitoring chronic skin conditions. Its ability to perform fast, easily repeatable sampling procedures without significant discomfort or damage to the skin makes it particularly valuable in studies requiring longitudinal monitoring.
Microbiopsy technology allows for continuous assessment with minimal impact on the patient's quality of life. Embracing this technology may positively impact the future of dermatological sample collection and rewrite the patient experience. It has the potential to offer a future where skin biopsies become quick, painless, and more accessible than ever.
1 Matsumoto, M., et al. (2018). “Estimating the cost of skin cancer detection by dermatology providers in a large health care system.” J Am Acad Dermatol 78(4): 701-709 e701.
Share this
- Microsampling (206)
- Research, Remote Research (119)
- Venipuncture Alternative (106)
- Clinical Trials, Clinical Research (83)
- Mitra® Device (73)
- Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, TDM (50)
- Dried Blood Spot, DBS (38)
- Biomonitoring, Health, Wellness (31)
- Infectious Disease, Vaccines, COVID-19 (24)
- Decentralized Clinical Trial (DCT) (22)
- Blood Microsampling, Serology (21)
- Omics, Multi-Omics (19)
- Specimen Collection (17)
- Toxicology, Doping, Drug/Alcohol Monitoring, PEth (17)
- hemaPEN® Device (13)
- Preclinical Research, Animal Studies (12)
- Skin Microsampling, Microbiopsy (11)
- Pharmaceuticals, Drug Development (9)
- Industry News, Microsampling News (5)
- Harpera Device (4)
- Antibodies, MAbs (3)
- Company Press Release, Product Press Release (3)
- Environmental Toxins, Exposures (1)
- October 2024 (3)
- September 2024 (1)
- June 2024 (1)
- May 2024 (1)
- April 2024 (4)
- March 2024 (1)
- February 2024 (2)
- January 2024 (4)
- December 2023 (3)
- November 2023 (3)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (3)
- July 2023 (3)
- June 2023 (2)
- April 2023 (2)
- March 2023 (2)
- February 2023 (2)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (3)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (5)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (4)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (3)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (3)
- March 2020 (6)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (2)
- September 2019 (4)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (3)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (6)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (6)
- February 2019 (5)
- January 2019 (8)
- December 2018 (3)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (6)
- August 2018 (5)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (4)
- February 2018 (6)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (4)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (6)
- April 2017 (6)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (1)
- July 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think