The word “biopsy” has always been associated with fear because it calls to mind an image of painful procedures that remove chunks of skin or tissue from the body – a necessary step to screen us for cancer or other dreaded skin diseases.
In some cases, the microbiopsy technique may be used as an alternative for more invasive or complex skin biopsy techniques that may not be necessary.
The technique involves removing only a sub-millimeter skin specimen as swiftly and gently as possible, often without the need for numbing agents or stitches to close the micro-wound.The mark left on the skin by a handheld microbiopsy tool is typically the size of a pin-dot or mosquito bite, without the inflammatory reaction you might see with more invasive methods. Often, within a few hours this tiny mark is not visible to the naked eye.
Why a biopsy and when is it needed?
Often, a dermatologist or other healthcare provider can diagnose certain skin conditions simply by looking at them. Yet many skin conditions, infections or abnormalities require a biopsy for further confirmation of the diagnosis. A skin biopsy procedure is therefore undertaken to remove the suspicious area of skin or tissue from the unfortunate patient who has to endure the uncomfortable procedure.
Biopsy Types
The three common types of skin or tissue biopsy currently used to collect skin specimens for laboratory testing are moderately invasive, and typically require complex procedures performed by a specialized dermatologist or surgeon:
Any of these biopsy types can be associated with negative factors and drawbacks for both the patient and healthcare professional.
The microbiopsy technique was therefore developed to provide healthcare providers and, ultimately, patients an alternative pathway to detect and monitor specific molecular markers of skin conditions without the negative factors associated with the existing types of biopsy procedures.
Skin microbiopsy technology was initially developed for use in molecular research to detect and monitor targeted biomarkers of skin cancers (e.g., melanoma and basal cell carcinoma) within and outside lesions. It also was developed to detect biomarkers of infectious skin diseases, such as viral warts or those from parasites.
The minimally invasive microbiopsy approach has the potential to also help clinicians in determining a person’s risk factors for developing skin cancers or other skin conditions, such as psoriasis or rosacea. An early identification of risk can facilitate prevention and early intervention at lower cost and reduced burden on the patient. Lastly, the approach enables any healthcare provider to collect a skin microbiopsy specimen from a patient without specialized training or certification.
Here are some areas where microbiopsy technology may be useful:
There is increased demand in dermatology research to investigate personalized skin therapies and to develop tools that can facilitate topical skin monitoring of inflammatory diseases, infectious diseases, and others. In the dermatology research field there also is a shift away from histopathology assessment toward targeted molecular diagnosis.
This requires additional skin tissue specimens to be collected to enable information-rich decision making. The need for more research specimens creates a challenge – study volunteers (patients) are more likely to resist frequent sampling with invasive methods like shave or punch biopsy.
Microbiopsy can potentially provide a less invasive topical sampling method that enables the collection of additional specimens over time without the discomfort of more invasive methods.
The development of medicinal creams for skin conditions requires the pharmaceutical industry to conduct clinical trials to bring a safe and effective product to the market. The challenge is to make truly adaptive clinical trials by acquiring high-quality datasets swiftly and economically. Principal investigators need to be able to intervene in instances of non-compliance while enabling the collection of more and alternate data points. This is currently not possible with traditional skin sampling.
A skin microbiopsy workflow could help simplify the volunteer recruitment process for clinical trials by eliminating the clinical and ethical concerns related to traditional biopsy. Additionally, skin microbiopsy could improve the patient experience, thereby improving compliance and retention in the clinical study. Microbiopsy could also improve the acquisition of additional samples and topical data points, thus reducing overall costs and shortening the trial and time to market.
There are many skin concerns beyond skin cancers or diseases that need to be assessed, including skin type, spots, dark circles, redness, etc. These skin concerns usually involve cosmetically sensitive areas of the body (i.e., face, neck, hands), which obliges clinicians to use non-invasive and subjective methods for assessment. Yet, providing precise assessment of skin conditions without using invasive methods is a challenge.
A skin microsample allows professionals in cosmetology and wellness settings to offer more personalized and in-depth skin consultations, without the need for large, expensive equipment or specialized training. A skin consultant can potentially use the microbiopsy tool to collect a quick skin microsample and perform a skin analysis to guide individualized skincare and product recommendations. Personalized skincare regimens are easy to build once the skin tissue has been analyzed to generate high-quality data.
Skin disease control and surveillance are the mission of epidemiology organizations and other governmental public health institutes. Such groups usually conduct their research in remote settings – in low- and middle-income countries where such diseases may be more prevalent.
For example, Cutaneous Leishmaniasis (CL) is one such skin disease that is prevalent in Central and South America, the Mediterranean Basin, the Middle East, and Central Asia, with approximately 1 million new cases per year. CL is caused by parasites which are transmitted by the bite of infected sandflies. It is challenging for health institutes to screen for CL to improve disease control and surveillance using standard skin sampling methodologies.
A skin microsampling method could improve the standard of care for CL in such countries by providing a means for early diagnosis, parasite species identification and, ultimately, to provide adequate treatment prior to scar formation and further stigmatization of individuals.
As with practitioners in the dermatology sector, veterinarians seek minimally invasive methods for diagnosing, monitoring and treating animal skin diseases. Also, in the context of the ethical use of animals for product testing and epidemiological studies, it is challenging for research scientists to rely on invasive skin sampling methods that may inflict pain or harm to study animals.
A skin microbiopsy would provide veterinarians and research scientists a more ethical way to frequently monitor the health of animals with advanced analytical techniques from a microbiopsy specimen. Microbiopsy could also enable repeated specimen collection for more efficient animal modelling.
Researchers at the University of Queensland developed a small, portable microbiopsy tool—modeled after a finger-stick lancet—for quick and easy skin sampling in a broad range of settings, without the need for a trained specialist to perform the sample collection.
Harpera™, the small tool they invented, enables remote skin tissue sample collection for analysis at the laboratory. It may provide a simple and comfortable sampling option for healthcare providers, cosmetologists, and other professionals in clinical or non-traditional environments. The Harpera microbiopsy collection approach is designed to work with existing methodologies and is suited to modern molecular diagnosis.
Learn more about the Harpera tool here:
Related Reading:
Jain, M.,et al. (2022). "Minimally invasive microbiopsy for genetic profiling of melanocyticlesions: A case series." J Am Acad Dermatol 87(4): 903-904.
Preis, S., et al. (2022). "Munich atopy prediction study (MAPS): protocol for a prospective birth cohort addressing clinical and molecular risk factors for a topic dermatitis in early childhood." BMJ Open12 (9):e059256.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (April 2023). “Using BCG Vaccine to Understand Tuberculosis Infection”, NCT05820594 (ClinicalTrials.gov)
Van Henten, S., et al. (2024)."Evaluation of Less Invasive Sampling Tools for the Diagnosis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis." Open Forum Infect Dis 11(4): ofae113.
Image Credits: Trajan, Neoteryx