Share this
the debate over harmonization in clinical research
by Neoteryx on Aug 27, 2018 12:01:00 AM
Clinical research laboratories carry out testing or analysis in different ways during drug trials and other studies. This can cause discrepancies between labs that may affect results. The results are important since they are used to determine the health status of a study participant and the kind of benefits or side effects the participant will experience. These discrepancies have increased the need for harmonization to improve the system.
What Is Harmonization?
Harmonization is an endeavor that aims to achieve comparable results even when different procedures are used. It can be easily confused with standardization, which is achieving comparable results by having a reference measurement procedure that can be used to calibrate the results. Standardization is mainly used for academic purposes while harmonization is not limited to the world of academics.
What Harmonization Will Do
Different results for lab procedures can be catastrophic. Personnel who are not familiar with the procedures can misinterpret the results. This can result in the effects on study participants being misinterpreted, and outcomes being incorrectly reported. A fixed laboratory value is used in many clinical guidelines to make decisions. For this to continue being effective, the results need to be harmonized.
Clinical research will also benefit from harmonization since different trials will be harmonized in central labs. Results obtained from clinical trials will not be useful until there are factors in place to harmonize the results.
How Lab Results Can Be Harmonized
Harmonization can be achieved by combining different methods using a secondary referencing material. The calibrator will be used as a measurement standard for the tests and can be used to interpret the results. There is a problem with this theory. Many secondary reference materials are not agreeable with clinical research lab procedures. Different samples will produce similar results. However, it is not uniform when it comes to actual samples.
Bodies such as the AACC are trying to develop infrastructures for harmonizing different clinical trials worldwide. If successful, it will make communication more transparent between both local and international organizations. This will go a long way to improving clinical trials and outcomes by giving measurements for those procedures that do not have measurement standards.
When it comes to clinical research, a lot can be done to improve it. One of these things is incorporating harmonization in laboratory procedures. Once the research is translated to clinical settings, harmonization will also help improve patient care by ensuring that patients get the right lab results and, thus, the right diagnosis.
Share this
- Alternative to Venipuncture (95)
- Clinical Trials (54)
- Capillary Blood Sampling (34)
- Remote Blood Collection (28)
- Alternative to Dried Blood Spot (27)
- research studies (24)
- Microsampling (22)
- Immunosuppressants (17)
- Coronavirus (16)
- RNA / DNA from Dried Blood (13)
- finger-stick microsampling (11)
- remote microsampling (11)
- therapeutic drug monitoring (10)
- COVID-19 (8)
- Viral Pathogens (8)
- remote microsampling study (8)
- Blood Collection At Home (7)
- remote specimen collection (7)
- SARS-CoV-2 (6)
- specimen collection (6)
- clinical research (5)
- Blood Sampling (4)
- Pharmacokinetics (4)
- Antibodies (3)
- anti-doping (3)
- anticancer (3)
- blood samples (3)
- coronavirus pandemic (3)
- home blood collection (3)
- microbiopsy (3)
- remote research studies (3)
- remote technologies (3)
- cannabis and cannabinoids (2)
- dried blood (2)
- mAbs (2)
- pediatric clinical trials (2)
- serology studies (2)
- DBS (1)
- Education (1)
- Extractions / Sample Prep (1)
- Genetic Profiling (1)
- Immunoassay (1)
- PEth (1)
- Sample Storage (1)
- antiepileptics (1)
- biospecimen collection (1)
- blood collection (1)
- clinical trial monitoring (1)
- creatinine (1)
- drug monitoring (1)
- genetic fingerprinting (1)
- heavy metal exposure (1)
- heavy metal poisoning (1)
- heavy metals (1)
- hormones (1)
- infectious disease studies (1)
- labs (1)
- molecular research (1)
- remote blood sampling (1)
- skin biopsy (1)
- tacrolimus (1)
- virtual clinical trials (1)
- February 2023 (1)
- January 2023 (3)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (3)
- October 2022 (4)
- September 2022 (3)
- August 2022 (5)
- July 2022 (2)
- June 2022 (2)
- May 2022 (4)
- April 2022 (3)
- March 2022 (3)
- February 2022 (4)
- January 2022 (5)
- December 2021 (3)
- November 2021 (5)
- October 2021 (3)
- September 2021 (3)
- August 2021 (4)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (4)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (3)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (4)
- January 2021 (4)
- December 2020 (3)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (4)
- September 2020 (3)
- August 2020 (3)
- July 2020 (6)
- June 2020 (4)
- May 2020 (4)
- April 2020 (3)
- March 2020 (6)
- February 2020 (3)
- January 2020 (4)
- December 2019 (5)
- November 2019 (6)
- October 2019 (4)
- September 2019 (5)
- August 2019 (5)
- July 2019 (4)
- June 2019 (7)
- May 2019 (6)
- April 2019 (5)
- March 2019 (6)
- February 2019 (6)
- January 2019 (8)
- December 2018 (4)
- November 2018 (4)
- October 2018 (7)
- September 2018 (8)
- August 2018 (6)
- July 2018 (8)
- June 2018 (6)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (5)
- February 2018 (7)
- January 2018 (4)
- December 2017 (2)
- November 2017 (3)
- October 2017 (2)
- September 2017 (5)
- August 2017 (2)
- July 2017 (4)
- June 2017 (5)
- May 2017 (6)
- April 2017 (6)
- March 2017 (5)
- February 2017 (4)
- January 2017 (1)
- July 2016 (3)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
Comments (1)